活動花絮
今天,在國立政治大學雙語多元文化辦公室副執行長暨英語教學資源中心主任鍾曉芳教授的帶領下,政大教師們及中心團隊懷抱著滿滿期待,搭乘遊覽車前往國立清華大學,展開一場充滿學習與交流的教師培訓之旅。雖然天空飄著細雨,卻絲毫未減教師們的熱情與投入。此行的主要目標是參加清華大學主辦的CertPT在職教師認證課程,期望藉由本次活動精進全英語授課(EMI)的教學品質,並與其他同樣對EMI教學充滿熱忱的教師們互相切磋、交流經驗。
一抵達清華大學,便受到清大英語教學精進中心林玉俊組長與黃玉婷研究助理的熱情接待,親自引領團隊前往清大會館辦理入住,展開這段充實的學習旅程。晚上,大家齊聚一堂共進晚餐,清大副教務長暨英語教學精進中心副主任劉奕汶教授及黃芸茵組長也特別出席,與大家輕鬆交流,分享彼此的EMI教學經驗與系所特色,為隔天即將展開的培訓課程暖身預熱。這不僅是一場專業成長的旅程,更是一段跨校合作、理念交流的美好開端。清政領英計畫,一起邁步向前!✨
Today, under the leadership of Professor Siaw-Fong Chung, Associate Executive Director of the Bilingual Education and Multicultural Promotion Office and Director of the EMI Resource Center at National Chengchi University (NCCU), NCCU faculty members and the center’s team embarked on an exciting journey of professional development and exchange. With great anticipation, they boarded a chartered bus bound for National Tsing Hua University (NTHU), setting out on a teacher training trip full of learning opportunities and meaningful interactions. Although a light drizzle accompanied the journey, it did nothing to dampen the enthusiasm and dedication of the participating teachers.
The primary goal of this visit is to attend the CertPT Certification Course for In-Service Teachers, organized by NTHU. Through this training, the team aims to enhance the quality of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) and engage in knowledge-sharing with like-minded educators who are equally passionate about EMI teaching. Upon arrival at NTHU, the group received a warm welcome from Mr. Yu-Chun Lin, Team Leader of The Center for EMI Excellence, and Training Assistant Yu-Ting Huang. They guided the team in person to the NTHU Guest House, marking the beginning of this enriching learning journey.
In the evening, everyone gathered for a welcome dinner. Professor Yi-Wen Liu, NTHU Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs and Deputy Director of the Center for EMI Excellence, along with Team Leader Yun-Yin Huang, also joined the gathering. In a relaxed and friendly atmosphere, they exchanged insights on EMI teaching practices and the unique characteristics of their respective departments, setting the stage for the training sessions to follow the next day.
This is not only a journey of professional development but also a wonderful beginning of inter-university collaboration and idea exchange. The EMI CertPT Workshop is moving forward together!✨
在「清政領英計畫」的第一天,清華大學與政治大學的長官們蒞臨現場為這個跨校合作計畫揭開序幕。清大教務長巫勇賢表示,很高興看到清大理工專長與政大人文背景能夠互補合作,為雙方師資與課程發展開啟新的可能性。而政大教務長林啓屏則感謝這次珍貴的合作機會,期望透過實地走訪與交流,深化兩校間的教學理解與合作情誼。接著政大雙多辦副執行長與英語教學資源中心鍾曉芳主任、清大副教務長劉奕汶教授、清大英語教學精進中心教學組林玉俊組長也一同到場致詞,展現出這項計畫的重視與規模。
第一天課程由ETI的Teacher Trainer Steven Murray 帶領,透過一場精彩有趣的自我介紹活動打破彼此陌生的隔閡,參與者在小白板上寫下一個數字,並互相猜測這個數字代表的意義。這樣的破冰方式既創新又輕鬆,讓每位與會者都能在笑聲中認識彼此。接下來進入課程主題「Effective lecturing」,透過分組討論,與會教師們思考了理想與實際的EMI(English as a Medium of Instruction)教學環境之差距,並分享各自面臨的問題與應對方式。在這個過程中,教師們不僅交流了教學經驗,也激發了許多具體的解方與反思。文章閱讀與心智圖繪製活動則進一步訓練了組織與表達能力。每組閱讀分配的段落後,須繪製心智圖並上台簡報,這樣的過程不只是單純閱讀,而是將資訊消化並視覺化,展現了如何在EMI教學中強化學生對抽象概念的理解。此外,透過「Visual teaching」技巧的探討,也提醒我們在簡報製作上應重視簡潔與清晰,並將口語與視覺表現互相搭配,使學生能更好掌握重點。
中場休息後,Steven引導與會教師們進行 Task 1 的整合性閱讀,這項任務巧妙地結合了分組合作與口語表達訓練。各組分工閱讀不同段落,再由成員解釋與分享,最終全班得以在短時間內掌握整體內容。這樣的設計既提升了學習效率,也讓我們體驗到分工合作在教學現場中的實用性。下午的課程重點之一是探討文化差異與尊重。我們以不同國籍分組進行互動,強調 EMI 教學的核心並非「英語」本身,而是一種跨文化的教學法與溝通方式。這提醒我們作為教師,不僅要教授內容,更要關注學生的文化背景與學習習慣,才能真正達到教學效果。
在「Giving feedback on micro-sessions」這一活動中,我們學習了如何給予發展性回饋,像是利用“praise sandwich”(讚美夾擊法)來提供正向且具建設性的評論。此外,也討論了教學時如何運用肢體語言、聲音強弱變化,以及幽默感來提升課堂的互動性與吸引力。這些細節看似微小,實則對課堂氛圍與學習效果有著深遠影響。課程最後簡介了Trinity Certification及其對教師專業發展的長遠價值,強調持續的實踐與認知挑戰能為教師與學生、甚至整個教育體系帶來正向循環。透過今天的密集訓練與多樣化活動,我們不僅收穫豐富的教學技巧,也對自身教學角色有了更深的認識。
課程結束後,大家一同前往清大校園內的餐廳共進晚餐,餐桌上的話題從教學方法延伸到日常生活,歡笑聲不斷。林玉俊老師率先開唱卡拉OK,其他老師也紛紛加入,一時之間現場熱鬧非凡,為這充實又精彩的第一天畫下完美句點。
On the first day of the EMI CertPT Workshop, esteemed leaders from National Tsing Hua University (NTHU) and National Chengchi University (NCCU) gathered to kick off this collaborative inter-university initiative. Prof. Yung-Hsien Wu, NTHU Vice President for Academic Affairs, expressed his delight in seeing the complementary strengths of NTHU's expertise in science and engineering and NCCU's background in the humanities come together. He noted that this partnership opens up new possibilities for faculty and curriculum development for both institutions. In his remarks, Prof. Chi-Ping Lin, NCCU Vice President for Academic Affairs, expressed his gratitude for this precious opportunity for collaboration. He hoped that through site visits and exchanges, the two universities would deepen their mutual understanding of teaching and strengthen their cooperative friendship. Next, in attendance to deliver remarks were the Associate Executive Director of NCCU Office of Bilingual and Multicultural Promotion Office, Director Siaw-Fong Chung of the EMI Resource Center, Prof. Yi-Wen Liu, NTHU Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs, and Prof. Yu-Chun Lin, Team Leader of NTHU EMI Center, demonstrating the significance and scale of the program.
The courses on the first day were led by ETI Teacher Trainer Steven Murray, who broke the ice with a fun and engaging self-introduction activity. Participants wrote a number on a small whiteboard, and others guessed its meaning. This innovative and relaxed icebreaker allowed everyone to get to know each other amidst laughter. The session then moved on to the main topic, "Effective Lecturing." Through group discussions, the participating faculty members contemplated the gap between ideal and actual EMI (English as a Medium of Instruction) teaching environments and shared the challenges they face and their strategies for dealing with them. In this process, the teachers not only exchanged pedagogical experiences but also sparked many concrete solutions and reflections. An article reading and mind-mapping activity further honed their organizational and expressive skills. A subsequent article-reading and mind-mapping activity further trained organizational and expressive skills: after each group read an assigned passage, they created a mind map and presented it on stage. This process was not merely about reading but about digesting and visualizing information, demonstrating how to enhance students' comprehension of abstract concepts in EMI teaching. Furthermore, a discussion on "Visual Teaching" techniques served as a reminder of the importance of simplicity and clarity in presentation design, and the need to coordinate verbal and visual elements to help students better grasp key points.
After a mid-session break, Steven guided the faculty through an integrated reading task, Task 1, which skillfully combined group collaboration with oral expression training. Each group divided the reading of different passages among its members, who then explained and shared what they had read. This allowed the entire class to grasp the overall content in a short amount of time. Such a design not only improved learning efficiency but also allowed participants to experience the practical application of collaborative work in a classroom setting. A key focus of the afternoon session was the exploration of cultural differences and respect. We engaged in interactions in groups based on different nationalities, emphasizing that the core of EMI teaching is not "English" itself, but a cross-cultural pedagogy and a method of communication. This reminded us, as instructors, that we must attend not only to content delivery but also to students' cultural backgrounds and learning habits to truly achieve effective teaching.
In the "Giving feedback on micro-sessions" activity, we learned how to provide developmental feedback, such as using the "praise sandwich" method to offer positive and constructive comments. Additionally, there were discussions on how to use body language, variations in voice volume, and a sense of humor to enhance classroom interaction and engagement. These details, though seemingly minor, have a profound impact on the classroom atmosphere and learning outcomes. The course concluded with a brief introduction to Trinity Certification and its long-term value for professional teacher development, emphasizing that continuous practice and cognitive challenges can create a positive cycle for teachers, students, and even the entire educational system. Through today's intensive training and diverse activities, we not only gained a wealth of teaching skills but also a deeper understanding of our roles as educators.
After the course, everyone proceeded to a restaurant on the NTHU campus for dinner. The conversation at the dinner table extended from teaching methods to daily life, and laughter filled the air. Prof. Yu-Chun Lin was the first to start the karaoke, and other teachers soon joined in, creating a lively and festive atmosphere that brought a perfect end to this fulfilling and wonderful first day.
💡 Micro-Teaching Session:
Bo-Han Chen 陳柏翰
Assistant Professor
Department of Electrical Engineering / Institute of Photonics Technologies, NTHU
Welcome dinner at the MATCH Kitchen Lab, NCCU.
Participants from NTHU were welcomed by our Vice President for Academic Affairs, Professor Chi-Ping Lin.
The team was led by the Director of the EMI Resource Center, Professor Siaw-Fong Chung, who traveled from Hsinchu to Taipei with participants from both universities following two days of training at NTHU. The third and fourth days of the program will be held at NCCU.
More updates about the training are coming soon.
6月10日上午的活動由國立清華大學資訊工程學系陳宜欣教授帶領,主題為「Using Cummins’ Framework to Effectively Develop Cognitive Skills」。課程首先介紹了認知負荷理論(Cognitive Load Theory),指出人類大腦在學習時仰賴工作記憶(working memory)來處理資訊,而其容量是有限的。因此,當教學設計超出學生能承受的處理量時,學習效果將大幅下降。陳老師提醒教師,應在課程設計中有意識地減少不必要的外在干擾,同時調整教學內容的內在負荷,讓學生在合理的認知壓力下有效學習。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
接著,陳老師引導與會教師認識Cummins的四象限框架(Cummins’ Framework)。該框架指出,學習任務的難易度取決於兩項因素:認知挑戰程度(Cognitive Demand)與語境支持程度(Context Embeddedness)。在第二語言教學情境中,若活動具有較高的語境支持(例如使用圖片、影片或操作實作等),可有效降低學生的學習難度;反之,抽象或純文字的任務則需更高的認知參與。因此,教師在設計課程時,應妥善平衡任務挑戰與認知負荷,以提升學生的理解與參與度。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
在實作活動中,參與者以三人小組進行「拼圖閱讀(Jigsaw Reading)」。每位成員負責閱讀Cummins框架說明的一個段落,並以「每句最多五個字」的方式進行摘要筆記,接著輪流向組員簡要報告內容。小組完成彼此說明後,討論並整理出五項最具啟發性的要點,最後寫在迷你白板上進行全班分享。此外,教師們也針對日常教學活動進行分類討論,判斷其在Cummins框架中的位置,並思考如何透過調整語境支持來協助學生更有效地理解課程內容。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
隨後進行的微型教學演練中,上午與下午場的教師輪番進行教學演示。每位教師有10分鐘進行課堂模擬,台下觀課教師則分組觀察四個面向:表達技巧(presentation skill)、互動設計(interaction)、語言使用(language)與發音(pronunciation)。課程最後由講師整合各組觀察結果並提供回饋。參與教學的教師包括:上午場的政大資訊科學系謝佩璇老師、清大電機系與光電所陳柏翰老師、清大科技法律研究所蔡昌憲老師,以及清大生命科學暨醫學院傅化文老師;下午場則由政大東南亞學系劉小慧老師與清大英語教育中心陳韙寧老師擔任教學示範。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
下午場的第二階段課程由清大英語教學中心劉文貞講師主導,主題為「Fostering Student Speaking in EMI and CLIL Courses: Pedagogical Strategies and Classroom Applications」。課程以小組討論為開場,邀請與會教師探討兩個問題:「學生的口語能力在EMI課程中是否重要?為什麼?」以及「在你的EMI課堂中,學生口語表達面臨哪些挑戰?」多數教師表示,學生的口語能力對於課程參與、提問互動與小組討論至關重要。然而,也有不少教師指出,學生常因為害羞、依賴母語或課堂時間有限,而無法充分進行口語表達。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
針對上述挑戰,Jennifer老師指出,口語不只是語言輸出行為,更是促進認知深化的過程。當學生用英語解釋課堂概念時,能強化其理解力與批判性思維;而在發言準備過程中,學生也更能積極傾聽、思考與參與。她建議教師可透過提供預習材料、設計簡短討論問題或安排同儕互動任務,降低學生的語言焦慮,並協助其逐步建立自信與表達能力。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
在課程尾聲,Jennifer老師說明了課後任務Task 2:教學資源調整與理據分析報告。教師需選擇一項尚未理想的教材,提出改善計畫並撰寫分析報告。作業評分標準涵蓋四大面向:課堂實務的合理性、教育情境的定位、專業實踐的洞見、以及學術格式與引用的正確性。Jennifer建議,教師應挑選一項明顯具有改善空間的教材,並於報告中納入至少八筆參考文獻,以支持其設計思維與教學決策。透過理論講授與實務操作交錯進行,本次課程深化了教師對認知理論與語言學習策略的理解,也為日後課堂實踐提供了豐富的資源與反思機會。
The morning session on June 10 was led by Professor Yi-Shin Chen, from the Department of Computer Science at NTHU. Professor Chen also serves as the Chair of the International Bachelor Degree Program and the leader of the Taiwan Artificial Intelligence College Alliance (TAICA). The session was titled “Using Cummins’ Framework to Effectively Develop Cognitive Skills.”
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
The session began with an introduction to Cognitive Load Theory, which explains that human learning relies heavily on working memory, a system with limited capacity. When instructional design exceeds what students can cognitively manage, learning efficiency significantly declines. Professor Chen emphasized that teachers should intentionally reduce unnecessary extraneous load and adjust intrinsic cognitive load in their lesson planning, so students can learn effectively under manageable cognitive conditions.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Following this, Professor Chen introduced Cummins’ Four Quadrant Framework, which classifies learning tasks based on two key dimensions: Cognitive Demand and Context Embeddedness. In second language learning environments, tasks that are context-embedded—such as those involving images, videos, or hands-on activities—can help reduce the cognitive burden. In contrast, abstract or text-heavy tasks demand greater cognitive effort from learners. Therefore, educators should strive to balance cognitive challenge and load in their lesson design to enhance student comprehension and engagement.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
During the practical segment, participants engaged in a Jigsaw Reading activity in groups of three. Each member was assigned a different section explaining Cummins’ framework and was asked to summarize it using no more than five words per sentence. Group members then took turns sharing their summaries with one another. After completing their explanations, groups identified five key takeaways and wrote them on a mini whiteboard for class-wide sharing. Additionally, teachers discussed how to categorize typical classroom activities within Cummins’ framework and considered how modifying contextual support could help students better grasp the content.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
The session continued with a microteaching practice involving both morning and afternoon participants. Each teacher delivered a 10-minute instructional demonstration while observers evaluated the presentation across four dimensions: presentation skills, interaction design, language use, and pronunciation. At the end of each session, the facilitator synthesized feedback from the groups and offered professional input. Participating instructors included, morning session: Pei-Hsuan Hsieh (Department of Computer Science, NCCU), Bo-Han Chen (Department of Electrical Engineering and Institute of Photonics Technologies, NTHU), Chang-Hsien (Robert) Tsai (Institute of Technology Law, NTHU), and Hua-Wen Fu (College of Life Science and Medicine, NTHU); afternoon session: Pranee Saengchan (Department of Southeast Asian Studies, NCCU), and Nancy Wei-Ning Chen (Center of English Education, NTHU).
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
The afternoon session featured a session led by trainer Jennifer W. Liu from the Center of English Education at National Tsing Hua University. Her session, titled “Fostering Student Speaking in EMI and CLIL Courses: Pedagogical Strategies and Classroom Applications,” began with group discussions prompting participants to reflect on two guiding questions: “Is student speaking important in EMI classrooms? Why?” and “What challenges do your students face when speaking in EMI courses?” Many educators agreed that speaking proficiency is essential for engaging with content, asking questions, and participating in group discussions. However, they also highlighted common challenges, such as student shyness, reliance on their first language, and limited class time for oral practice.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
In response, Ms. Liu explained that speaking is not just a form of language output but also a cognitive process that enhances understanding. When students articulate concepts in English, they reinforce comprehension and develop critical thinking skills. Moreover, preparing to speak encourages students to listen actively and participate more meaningfully. To support students in building speaking confidence, she recommended providing pre-task materials, scaffolded discussion prompts, and peer interaction tasks to reduce anxiety and promote engagement.
⠀
At the end of the session, Ms. Liu introduced Task 2, a post-workshop assignment requiring participants to identify a less-than-ideal teaching resource, propose improvements, and write a rationale-based report. The report is evaluated across four criteria: rationale for classroom practice, framing within the educational setting, insight into professional practice, academic conventions and referencing. Ms. Liu advised teachers to select a resource with clear room for improvement and support their redesign with at least eight academic references. By integrating theory with practice, this workshop not only deepened participants’ understanding of cognitive frameworks and language learning strategies but also offered concrete opportunities for reflection and practical application.
Diau-Long Shen 沈雕龍
Assistant Professor
Department of Music, NTHU
Fabricio Fonseca 馮慕文
Assistant Professor
Departmet of Diplomacy, NCCU
Hsiu-Yu Chen 陳綉諭
Assistant Professor
Foreign Language Center, NCCU
Ching-Ting Hsin 辛靜婷
Professor and Chair
Department of Early Childhood Education, NTHU
Chawarote Valyamedhi 樊夏
Assistant Professor
Department of Southeast Asian Languages and Cultures, NCCU
Jasin Wong 翁嘉遜
Assistant Professor
Department of Special Education, NTHU
6 月 11 日為「清政領英計畫」的第三天,由 ETI(English Teaching Institute)教師培訓師 Jenna Cody 擔任講師,進行主題為 「Developing Language Awareness: Focus on Functional Language」 的工作坊。Jenna 引導與會教師深入探討功能性語言在 EMI 教學中的角色與實踐策略,透過拼圖式閱讀活動(jigsaw reading),協助參與者理解功能性語言的多樣表達方式,如表達同意/不同意、協商、釐清意見等,並比較如 “It seems to me…” 與 “I really think…” 等語句在語氣與語用上的差異。Jenna 特別強調,功能性語言能提升學生的口語表達、促進批判思考,並營造互動式的學習情境。她也建議教師自製教材並融入互動導向的活動設計,並呼籲在規劃課程語言時應考量學生程度與課堂時間,以兼顧學術性與清晰度。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
隨後於第五會議室進行上午場的試教觀摩與回饋,教師們展示各自的 EMI 教學實作成果。政大創新國際學院的江順楠老師以「解析永續發展目標(SDGs)」為題,透過辨識 MDGs 與 SDGs 的活動啟發學生思辨;清大音樂學系沈雕龍老師則以「莫札特」與「不朽」為主題,結合提問與簡報進行引導式教學;政大外交學系馮慕文老師以國際關係議題為核心,巧妙運用問題導入與新聞圖片激發學生討論。在第三會議室中,由 Steven 老師帶領觀摩與回饋,清大數理所林勇吉老師以「加法教學」為主題,設計三項活動協助學生在抽象與具體概念間轉化;政大資訊科學系孫士勝老師介紹「工業物聯網與營運技術安全」,透過歷史與當代案例連結主題,內容深具啟發性。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
下午場的試教與回饋由 Jenna 老師持續主持。政大外文中心陳綉諭老師以詩作〈Those Winter Sundays〉引導學生連結自我經驗與語言情感,課程設計豐富有趣,回饋建議為可聚焦關鍵活動以提升學習成效。清大外語系林雅瓊老師以「萬隆會議」為主題,呈現亞洲視角的歷史轉變,獲得與會者好評,並建議可進一步增設批判性思考的活動環節。清大幼兒教育系辛靜婷老師則介紹如何應用 Inquiry Cycle 設計早期 STEM 教學,內容多元且教學熱情,Jenna 建議若時間允許,可增加活動展示及術語說明以深化學習。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
同時,另一場次由 Steven 老師主持,政大與清大的多位教師進行試教,包括:政大東南亞語言文化學程樊夏老師主講 “Feminize the Buddhas! Sacred Images and Gender in Laak Phra Ritual in Southern Thailand”;英語教學資源中心吳承翰老師以 “How do you feel about Shield’s sexy commercial?” 帶動思考與討論;清大特殊教育學系翁嘉遜老師則介紹學習障礙類型,著重說明「書寫障礙(dysgraphia)」概念。三位教師展現跨文化與多元主題的教學實踐,場下與會者皆專注參與並提供具體回饋。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
課程最後,Jenna 老師帶領全體學員總結 Tasks 3 與 4 的教學任務重點。Task 3 要求學員為其自製教學資源撰寫教學理據,並規劃 15 分鐘以上的教學設計;Task 4 則為反思自製或改編教材在教學上的應用與效果。透過這兩項任務的整理與討論,學員得以整合理論與實作,深化對教學資源設計與實踐的理解,為本日課程劃下圓滿句點。
June 11 marked the third day of the EMI CertPT Workshop. The day began with a workshop titled “Developing Language Awareness: Focus on Functional Language” led by Jenna Cody, a teacher trainer from the English Teaching Institute (ETI). Jenna guided participating faculty through an in-depth exploration of the role and practical strategies of functional language in EMI (English as a Medium of Instruction) teaching. Using a jigsaw reading activity, she helped participants examine the various communicative functions of functional language—such as expressing agreement or disagreement, negotiating, and clarifying opinions—and compare expressions like “It seems to me…” and “I really think…” in terms of tone and usage. Jenna emphasized that functional language enhances students’ oral communication skills, fosters critical thinking, and supports the creation of interactive learning environments. She also encouraged instructors to design their own materials with interactive activities in mind, while considering students’ proficiency levels and available class time to balance clarity and academic rigor.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
In the late morning, teaching demonstrations and feedback sessions were held in Meeting Room 5. Teachers showcased their EMI teaching practices: Shun-Nan Chiang from the International College of Innovation at NCCU led a session on analyzing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), using a comparison activity between MDGs and SDGs to stimulate student reflection. Diau-long Shen from the Department of Music at NTHU explored the theme of “Mozart and Immortality,” combining questioning techniques with presentations. Fabricio Fonseca from the Department of Diplomacy at NCCU focused on international relations, using guiding questions and news images to spark discussion.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Meanwhile, in Meeting Room 3, another set of demonstrations and discussions was led by Steven. Yung-Chi Lin from the Graduate Institute of Mathematics and Science Education at NTHU presented a lesson on “addition,” using three interactive activities to help students transition between abstract and concrete mathematical concepts. Shi-Sheng Sun from the Department of Computer Science at NCCU introduced the topic of Industrial IoT and Operational Technology Security, making connections between historical and contemporary examples to enrich students’ understanding.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
The afternoon session, also moderated by Jenna, continued with more teaching demonstrations and feedback. Hsiu-yu Chen from the Foreign Language Center at NCCU led a lesson centered on the poem “Those Winter Sundays,” guiding students to connect personal experiences with emotional expression in language. Her lesson was creative and engaging; feedback suggested focusing more on the core learning activity to maximize impact. Nga Khing Lim from the Department of Foreign Languages and Literature at NTHU presented a lesson on the Bandung Conference, highlighting the historical shift in Asian perspectives. Participants praised the quality of her discussion prompts and recommended including more opportunities for critical thinking. Ching-Ting Hsin from the Department of Early Childhood Education at NTHU introduced how to use the Inquiry Cycle to design early STEM activities. Her passionate delivery and diverse content were well received, and Jenna recommended incorporating more demonstrations and explanation of key terminology if time permits.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
At the same time, under Steven’s facilitation, another group conducted their own microteaching session: Chawarote Valyamedhi from the Southeast Asian Languages and Cultures at NCCU presented “Feminize the Buddhas! Sacred Images and Gender in Laak Phra Ritual in Southern Thailand.” Cheng-han Wu from the NCCU EMI Resource Center initiated discussion using the provocative prompt: “How do you feel about Shield’s sexy commercial?” Jasin Wong from the Department of Special Education at NTHU introduced different types of learning disabilities, with a focus on dysgraphia. These sessions showcased rich, multicultural teaching practices, with participants actively engaged and providing thoughtful feedback throughout.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
To conclude the day, Jenna led a summary session focused on Tasks 3 and 4 of the training program: Task 3 required participants to produce a rationale for a self-designed teaching resource suitable for at least 15 minutes of instruction or training for a specified learner group. Task 4 asked participants to reflect on the use of either the adapted resource (from Task 2) or the original resource (from Task 3). By engaging in these tasks, participants were able to connect theory with practice, gaining a deeper understanding of how to design and reflect on EMI teaching materials. The day ended on a strong and constructive note, not only enhancing faculty understanding of EMI principles but also providing actionable, experience-based strategies to support the future development of bilingual education.
6 月 12日為「清政領英計畫」的第四天,由王于瑞Jason Farhad A.K. Cassim (NYUST CertPT Director)主講,主題是Promoting Active Listening in EMI Classes,Jason表示當我們在EMI課程中設計聽力活動時,關鍵不只是讓學生「聽懂」,而是要幫助他們進行「思考性的聽力」(listening as thinking)。為了達到這個目的,我們可以設計不同層次的聽力任務來逐步建立學生的理解與思辨能力。這些任務可以分為四個層次:理解層次、連結層次、批判層次、分類層次。這樣的任務設計能讓學生不只是聽,而是思考著聽。在教學設計上,我們也要思考「有支架」(with scaffolds)與「無支架」(without scaffolds)兩種情況的差異。若缺乏支架,學生可能只會被動地接收資訊、進行低效的筆記,導致學習效果不佳;相對地,若提供適當的支架,如概念填空筆記、關鍵詞提示、或後設思考活動,學生不但能更有意識地整理資訊,也能提升理解與記憶效果。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
在設計EMI課程時,我們可以依據CERTPT教學設計框架進行規劃。首先,要明確設定學生的學習目標(Learning Goals),如提升學術聽力或參與全球議題;其次,確定教學主題(Topic),;最後,設定教學目標(Aims),例如讓學生能夠提出觀點、進行批判思考、或連結社會實踐。接著,選擇合適的「核心教材」與「輔助教材」來支持聽力任務,核心教材可以是影片、講座、或音檔,輔助教材則包含聽力筆記模板、詞彙表、概念圖工具等。透過這樣有系統、有層次的設計,EMI課程中的聽力活動將不再是被動吸收,而是成為學生主動建構知識與批判思考的重要途徑。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
接著課程進入微教學環節。第三會議室由Jennifer擔任講評者,首先登場的是清華大學工程與系統科學系的黃冠榮老師,講題為「Crystal Structures and Defects」。黃老師以QR Code提問作為課程開場,介紹課程大綱後,邀請觀眾朗讀晶體結構的定義,並搭配圖像與跑車照片,輔助說明三種晶體對稱操作,成功引導學生理解抽象概念。接續登場的是政治大學應用物理研究所兼任電機資訊學院電腦科學系的許琇娟老師,她以「Introducing Quantum Annealing」為題,課程一開始透過定義配對活動協助學生複習關鍵詞,接著運用視覺動畫生動說明量子退火的基本概念,並以股市趨勢作為應用案例,幫助學生將理論與實務連結。同時間,第五會議室也進行了兩場教學示範,分別由政大資訊科學系的曾一凡老師,以及清大分析與環境科學所的周子勤老師帶來精彩呈現。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
下午稍晚,第三會議室再度舉行三場微教學示範。政大國家發展所 郭益昌老師探討中國女性移民的處境,聚焦於她們在城市中追求歸屬感與面對的社會限制與歧視。清大經濟系王遠樵老師比較管理與領導的差異,強調領導者需具備動態應變與激勵他人的能力。政大企業管理學系許育瑋老師介紹領導與動機概念,透過活動引導觀眾認識認知偏誤及目標導向行為的形成。第五會議室的三位講者則分別為清大生醫工程與環境科學系的張建文老師,講題與mRNA疫苗與歷史上milkmaid的關聯性有關;清大工業工程與工程管理學系的李雨青老師,她以“On Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals”為主題,安排與會教師輪流朗讀文章;以及清大英語教育中心的黃滿庭老師,針對學術寫作課程的教學設計分享創意點子與發展歷程,提供許多實務建議與反思。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
在享用完下午茶後,Jason老師帶領與會者回顧當日教學活動,進行 Task 1–4 Review,並針對教材資源的評估、調整、發展、創作與反思展開討論。最後,全體學員搭乘接駁車前往位於新竹的麻布山林(Mabuville, Hsinchu),為本日行程畫下圓滿句點。
The fourth day of the 2025 NTHU-NCCU Joint EMI CertPT Workshop took place on June 12, featuring an input session by Dr. Farhad A.K. Cassim, CertPT Course Director at National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (NYUST), titled “Promoting Active Listening in EMI Classes”. Dr. Cassim emphasized that when designing listening tasks in EMI classrooms, the focus should go beyond merely ensuring student comprehension. Instead, instructors should guide students toward “listening as thinking”—an approach that treats listening as a cognitively engaged activity. To achieve this, tasks can be designed across four progressive levels: comprehension, connection, critique, and classification. This layered framework encourages students to listen actively and critically rather than passively receive information.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Dr. Cassim also highlighted the importance of considering both scaffolded and non-scaffolded scenarios in instructional design. Without scaffolding, students may become passive recipients of information, relying on ineffective note-taking strategies that lead to limited learning outcomes. In contrast, appropriate scaffolds—such as guided note-taking templates, keyword prompts, and metacognitive reflection activities—can promote greater awareness, helping students to better organize information, deepen understanding, and improve retention.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
He then introduced the CertPT instructional design framework as a useful guide for EMI course planning. This framework begins with the articulation of clear learning goals, such as developing students’ academic listening skills or enabling engagement with global issues. Next, teachers select a relevant topic and determine specific instructional aims—for instance, to equip students to formulate viewpoints, think critically, or make connections to real-world contexts. Based on these aims, teachers choose suitable core materials and supplementary resources. Core materials may include videos, lectures, or audio recordings, while supporting tools may take the form of guided notes, vocabulary lists, or graphic organizers. Through such structured and intentional design, listening tasks in EMI classrooms become opportunities for active knowledge construction and critical engagement.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
The day then transitioned into the micro-teaching component. In Meeting Room 3, under the review of Dr. Jennifer W. Liu, the first presentation was delivered by Dr. Guan-Rong Huang from the Department of Engineering and System Science at National Tsing Hua University. Dr. Huang opened his session “Crystal Structures and Defects” with an interactive QR code activity and an overview of the course syllabus. He then engaged participants in reading aloud the definition of crystal structure and used images—including photographs of luxury cars—to illustrate three types of crystal symmetry operations. These visuals effectively clarified abstract scientific concepts for the audience.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Following Dr. Huang, Dr. Hsiu-Chuan Hsu, who holds a joint appointment with the Institute of Applied Physics and the Department of Computer Science at NCCU, presented on the topic “Introducing Quantum Annealing”. Her session began with a matching exercise to review key terms, followed by animated visualizations that conveyed the principles of quantum annealing in an accessible way. She concluded by linking theory to practice through a case study involving stock market trends, helping participants see the relevance of quantum physics to real-world phenomena.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Simultaneously, two other micro-teaching sessions took place in Meeting Room 5. These were led by Dr. Yi-Fan Tseng from the Department of Computer Science at National Chengchi University and Dr. Tsu-Chin Chou from the Institute of Analytical and Environmental Sciences at NTHU. Both shared innovative teaching demonstrations rooted in their respective disciplines.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Later in the afternoon, three additional presentations were held in Meeting Room 3. Dr. I-Chang Kuo of the Graduate Institute of Development Studies at NCCU explored the challenges faced by female migrants in China, with a particular focus on their pursuit of belonging in urban environments amid social constraints and discrimination. Dr. George Wang of the Department of Economics at NTHU examined the distinctions between management and leadership, underscoring the importance of adaptability and motivational skills in effective leadership. Dr. Yu-Wei Hsu of the Department of Business Administration at NCCU introduced key concepts in leadership and motivation, using interactive exercises to help the audience understand cognitive bias and the formation of goal-directed behavior.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
At the same time in Meeting Room 5, three more presenters shared their work. Dr. Chien-Wen Chang from NTHU’s Department of Biomedical Engineering and Environmental Sciences delivered a fascinating session connecting the development of mRNA vaccines to the historical role of milkmaids in smallpox prevention. Dr. Amy Lee of the Department of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management at NTHU led a discussion on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), inviting participants to take turns reading and analyzing related texts. Finally, Dr. Man-Ting Huang from the Center for English Education at NTHU shared creative strategies and reflective insights from her experience designing academic writing courses, offering practical suggestions and personal takeaways.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Following an afternoon tea break, Dr. Cassim reconvened the group for a reflective review of Tasks 1 through 4, leading a discussion on the evaluation, adaptation, development, and creation of teaching resources. Participants also reflected on how these practices contribute to improved pedagogical decision-making in EMI classrooms.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
To conclude the day, all workshop participants boarded the shuttle bus to Mabuville in Hsinchu, where they enjoyed a communal dinner, bringing a productive and inspiring fourth day of the workshop to a warm close.
Wei-Jeng Huang 黃維楨
Lecturer from Center of English Education, NTHU
Si-Ru Lin 林席如
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Lecturer from Center of English Education, NTHU
Helena Hrdlickova 赫萊娜
Exchange Lecturer
Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, NCCU
6 月 13 日,「清政領英計畫」進入第五天,由 NYUST 認證講師呂宜臻(Jane Lu)擔綱主講,課程主題為《Motivation and Interactive Activity Design in EMI Classrooms》。本日活動聚焦於如何在 EMI(以英語為授課語言)課堂中設計具備激發學習動機的互動式教學活動,協助與會教師深入理解動機理論,並掌握實用策略以提升學生參與度與學習效果。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Jane 老師首先介紹了兩個核心動機理論:其一是 Deci & Ryan 提出的自我決定理論(Self-Determination Theory, SDT),強調學習者的自主性、勝任感與關聯感為提升學習動機的關鍵;其二則為 Gardner & Lambert 的工具性與整合性動機理論,說明學生學習英語可能出於實用需求(如考試、升學、就業)或對語言文化的興趣與認同感。課堂中透過策略配對練習,引導教師辨識與應用實務中可行的動機激發方式,例如設定明確學習目標、適時給予正向回饋、讓學生選擇學習任務、導入遊戲與多媒體元素,以及設計小組合作活動等。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
隨後進行微教學活動,展現教師們對 EMI 教學策略的實踐與創新。清大英教中心黃維楨老師以 「Voice in Wonder: How Narrative Forms Our Understanding」為題,探討敘事與理解的關聯;清大英教中心林席如老師則分享 「Four Key Factors to Consider When Selecting a Research Topic」,從個人經驗出發,結合學術寫作策略與教學反思。來自政大斯拉夫語文學系的赫萊娜老師(Helena Hrdlickova)則以 「Czech Language and Its Pronunciation」為主題,介紹捷克語在語系中的定位、音位特徵及語音技巧,內容兼具語言學知識與文化元素。針對微教學環節,清大英語教學精進中心學生組組長黃芸茵進行點評與總結,肯定老師們生動教學與課堂互動的表現,特別指出教師走下講台與學生互動、運用手勢與目光交流等教學技巧,有效促進學生理解與專注。同時也建議在簡報製作上應避免資訊過載,適度簡化文字內容,善用指標工具如雷射筆以強調重點,提升視覺導引效果。
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
課程尾聲,Jane 老師帶領大家回顧 Task 1 至 Task 4,並開放提問,進行交流討論。老師們也在課堂中分組扮演不同角色,針對教材的評估、調整、開發與創製進行反思,深化教學策略的內化與應用。活動最後進行畢業證書頒發與合影留念,並以一場溫馨饗宴為本次為期五天的師資培訓課程畫下圓滿句點。教師們不僅充實了 EMI 教學的理論與實務知識,也在交流互動中建立深厚情誼,為未來推動雙語教育奠定堅實基礎。
On June 13, the fifth day of the EMI CertPT Workshop was led by NYUST-certified instructor Jane Lu, with the theme “Motivation and Interactive Activity Design in EMI Classrooms.” The day focused on how to design engaging and motivation-driven activities in EMI (English as a Medium of Instruction) classrooms. The goal was to help participating teachers gain a deeper understanding of motivation theories and acquire practical strategies to enhance student participation and learning outcomes.⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
Jane began by introducing two key theories of motivation. The first was Self-Determination Theory (SDT) by Deci and Ryan, which highlights autonomy, competence, and relatedness as the three essential factors in enhancing learning motivation. The second was Gardner and Lambert’s theory of instrumental and integrative motivation, which differentiates between learning English for practical needs (e.g., exams, academic advancement, career opportunities) and learning out of interest or cultural identification. Through a strategy-matching activity, teachers explored how to apply motivation theories in practice such as setting clear goals, providing timely positive feedback, allowing task choice, incorporating games and multimedia, and designing collaborative group work.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
This was followed by micro-teaching sessions, showcasing how teachers implement EMI strategies creatively and effectively. Wei-Jeng Huang, Lecturer from the Center of English Education, NTHU, presented “Voice in Wonder: How Narrative Forms Our Understanding,” exploring the connection between storytelling and comprehension. Lecturer Si-Ru Lin, also from the Center of English Education, shared “Four Key Factors to Consider When Selecting a Research Topic,” combining personal experiences with academic writing strategies and reflective teaching. Helena Hrdlickova, from the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures in NCCU, presented “Czech Language and Its Pronunciation,” introducing Czech’s linguistic features, phonetics, and cultural context, offering a unique blend of linguistics and culture.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
For feedback on the micro-teaching, Yun-Yin Huang, Student Group Director of EMI Center in NTHU, offered comments and summaries. She praised the teachers’ vivid instruction and classroom interaction, especially highlighting techniques such as stepping away from the podium to interact with students, using gestures and eye contact to aid understanding and focus. She also recommended minimizing information overload in slides, simplifying text, and using tools like laser pointers to visually guide students to key points.
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
To conclude the session, Jane led a review of Tasks 1 through 4 and opened the floor for questions and discussion. Teachers engaged in role-based group activities, reflecting on how to evaluate, adapt, and develop EMI materials, reinforcing the internalization and practical application of EMI teaching strategies. The day ended with a certificate presentation and group photo session, followed by a warm and joyful closing banquet. This marked a perfect finale to the five-day faculty development program. Not only did the teachers enrich their knowledge of EMI theory and practice, but they also formed strong connections through meaningful interactions, laying a solid foundation for advancing bilingual education in the future.